Nick : Re JBG - knowing when to hold em etc is a very tough question. IMO, your percentage profit or loss shouldn't determine when you sell, but this is easier said than done. 3 weeks ago I bought 10,000 shares in Crystallex at 3 & 7/8. I plan to hold em until they reach 25 or 2, whichever comes first.
GSC, M Sheller, Puetz, Donald, Others : What do you make of the recent strength in the small caps ? Most of us are familiar with the action in the Dow prior to past stock market collapses, but can anyone tell me how the small caps were behaving ( particularly in the months leading up to the 87 crash ) .
Thanks in advance, Milhouse
Canadian Newswire reports Liberia is minting commemorative coins in memory of Diana. silver ,1/5 oz. and 1/20 oz. gold. potential market is enormous. spread the word and lets get some of the supply into the hands of the masses.
Find out more about Kitco at info@kitco.com, or call 1-800-363-7053.
Copyright © 1996 Kitco Minerals & Metals Inc.
America's Founders worried that the government they created might someday grow too powerful, and begin to pass laws which would violate the rights of the very people it was intended to protect: ordinary, peaceful, productive folks. But they kept an "ace in the hole", a trump card they believed citizens could use to hold this new, experimental government in check. That ace was the right to a trial by a jury of one's peers.
How a jury can restrain a government? The key is that juries can say "no" to bad laws and to arbitrary and unjust prosecutions. It's true!
The Founders realized that the temptations of power and corruption would eventually prove to be too much for any of the three branches of our government to resist, let alone check and balance the other branches. They knew that government "of, by and for the people" meant that the people would every so often have to roll up their sleeves and exert their authority, to act as the final check and balance on the whole system. Since law is the main tool by which a government exerts its control,
trusting juries of ordinary citizens to veto the use of bad law was the logical choice.
So they provided for trial by jury--once in the Constitution, and twice more in the Bill of Rights. In those days, it was part of the definition of the word "jury" that its members could judge the law as well as the evidence, and the judge would often remind them of this power. For example, if jurors found the law to be unjust or misapplied, or that the defendant's rights had been violated in bringing the him or her to trial, they would acquit for those reasons, despite good evidence.
http://www.flash.net/~rcoursey/abbrhope.htm