To Bart- thank you for your wonderful site, which has enriched my life immeasurably.
To all the Lurkers- Lots of love and blessings to you all- we are indeed privileged to be able to connect with each other across the globe.
Have a HAPPY day!
Merry Christmas to all Goodguys
To Studio R. I love your Brother in Law's No 7 - " Greenspan will not be making statements like ""irrational exuberance"" anymore". Boy he got that right.
To Mr Vronsky - Merry Christmas and thanks for all your contribution.
Particularly on Delta - as I have a bunch. Because of Platinum holding.
We have all heard the sad smug song about the poor
old "deep" South African mines with inefficient strike
prone high cost workers with one eye on the rock face
and the other on their bosses throat.
Now suppose we forget words and pay attention to
music - the music of numbers -
Lets look at some mines - first we can
calculate their REAL cost directly from their earnings
per share and the gold price that pertained over the
reporting period. We will also need the number of shares
and the annual output.
Then we can approximate the VALUE of a share at
different gold prices from the cost calculated
above and their RESERVES per SHARE of stock ( ignoring
the discount effect required to more precisely estimate
the reserve value ) .
Ill give you the data from the Mining Journal. If
you disagree with it, then please provide your own data
and the source.
If the North American mines are best then I want to buy them.
If the Australians are best, then I want to buy them.
Im not limited in what I can buy - but I suspect some
of you may be.
First lets look at the methodology. Dont take my word
for it - please DO IT YOURSELVES. A lot of Bullsh*t
can be taken out of the game if you are willing to utilise
the ability with numbers that Im sure you have ( lawyers excepted ) .
If you dont agree with the methodology - fine - say so - but please
offer another one in its place with examples and data.
Lets look at some mines people have shown interest
in recently. Ill list a few mines- I use the year
ending one quarter back for ABX since they lost money
in the most recent year due to a large one off cost in
the last quarter. If I used that quarter, I would
obtain a false low value for them.
Data follows in format- Mine, No of shares ( mill ) ,
reserves ( mill oz ) , output ( mill oz ) , EPS ( $ ) ,
prevailing average gold price for the year in question.
Costs/oz are calculated by gold price ( $/oz )
minus EPS times shares divided by output.
This means revenue per oz ( the gold price ) minus profit per oz
must equal the REAL cost - BY DEFINITION since
profit/oz = revenue/oz minus cost/oz
Okay, thats one exercise but profit isnt everything.
Some companies have more reserves than others.
So - we will take their profit per oz times their
total RESERVES PER SHARE.
in other words - one share of stock represents
how many oz of reserves. - then take that amount
times the profit to be made per oz and you have a
very simple first approximation of the value of a
share of that stock - .
- If anyone ( well ALMOST anyone ) is interested in a
copy of this by email- Ive put it in "word" and Ill be
happy to send it to you. The formulas are easy for a
simple spread sheet set up. Offer is restricted to
EARTHLINGS and GOODGUYS and open until I erase it
by accident .
The data
ABX,373,76,3,0.60,362
Prime Resources,76,2,0.392,0.31,348
GCM,280,6.9,0.416,0.11,348
Normandy,1632,18,1342,0.04,348
beatrix,97,17,0.488,0.36,348
Western Deep,28,29* or 103**,1.08,1.44,348
* 29 = life of mine with no investment
**103 = proven, probable plus resource.
In ABX case 25 "resource" was included in total.
real costs follow
ABX = 362 - 0.6 times 373/3 = 287$/oz
Prime Resources = 348 - 0.31 times 76/.392 = 288$/oz
GCM = 348 - 0.11 times 280/0.416 = 273$/oz
Normandy = 348 - 0.04 times 1632/1.342 = 299$/oz
Beatrix = 348 - .36 times 97/.488 = 276$/oz
Western deep = 348 - 1.44 times 28/1.08 = 310$/oz
reported "cash costs" for information only
ABX 191
Prime Resources 173
GCM 221
Normandy 255
Beatrix 234
Western Deep 310
Now lets take all the reserves per share and multiply
by profit per oz at say 315
ABX 76/373 or 0.2oz/share times ( 315-287 ) =$5.6 vs. $18
Prime Resources 2/76 or 0.02 oz/share times ( 315-288 ) = $0.55 vs. $7
GCM 6.9/280 or 0.0245oz/share times ( 315- 273 ) =$1.02 vs. $1.1
Normandy 18/1632 or 0.01oz/share times ( 315 -299 ) = 0.16 vs. 1.0
Beatrice 17/97 or 0.17oz /share times ( 315-276 ) =$6.6 vs. $3.10
estern Deep* 29/28 or 1.03 oz per share times ( 315 -310 ) = 5.15 vs. $19
Western Deep** 103/28 = 3.6 oz per share times ( 315 -310 ) = 18 vs. $19
* low reserve
** high reserve - same basis as ABX
Now lets see what happens at 350$/oz
ABX 0.2 times ( 350-287 ) = $12.6 vs. $18 now ??
PR 0.02 times ( 350 -288 ) = $1.24 vs. $7 now ??
GCM 0.0245 times ( 350-273 ) = $1.88 vs. $1.1 now ??
Normandy 0.01 times ( 350-299 ) = $0.51 vs. $1.0 now ??
Beatrice 0.17 times ( 350 - 276 ) = $12.5 vs. $3.10 now
Western Deep * 1.03 times ( 350 -310 ) = $41.0 vs. $19 now
Western Deep** 3.6 times ( 350 -310 ) = $144.0 vs. $19 now
I think this must mean DEEP is EASY and Talk is CHEAP.
Prime seems to have a MAJOR reserve problem- Any information
available ??- I was about to buy this stock based on raves
from this group.
Many Australian stocks seem much too diluted with guess what -
PAPER SCRIPT - so that when you buy a share you get much
paper - little gold. This worries me as I hold delta, carpenter, and Ramsgate. Useful Comments will be appreciated.
Some of you like NA mines because you wish "to support
the North American miner" - I applaud your noble and
altruistic efforts. Pardon me if I dont join in -
Maybe Franco-Nevada is okay - Ill take a look..
A note to those who will say - "what about forward sales.?"
These are automatically taken into account as credits to
the REAL cost of the company. I.e. if we based the
calculation of ABX supposed forward sales at 420$/oz -
we would simply calculate a higher REAL cost for
them then we did.
To all good guys
Ill send anybody who is interested a copy by email of my recent posting on valuing gold mines. I will also set up a spread sheet on all the mines covered by the MJ. You know the methodology Im using.
Once I get set up, if some one requests info by email on a mine Ill send my valuation at different gold prices and the data Ive used.
I have no "vested self interest" - If you think I do - easy - dont
email me.
Werner - I cant give you a clear picture of anything much. Merry
Christmas.
The Hatt - You have been very busy of late talking about how scared these gold bears have been. And I think someone made a good reply ( can't remember who ) to the tune of "they have made LOTS-O-CASH on the way down and don't be so sure that they are running scared". This drive down is NOT over so don't get your goldbug heart too excited........there are powerful forces at work here and you should wait like the other gold bulls have before you start talking about LARGE MONEY running scared.......and, of course, have a good holiday ;- ) ) .
Now.....I must go back to the ugly materialist part of ( my ) x-mas......the ripping of the gifts.....h M!
away...to the ripping and tearing...uh huh.
hohohoing
ted-thanks bro...got the post
OLD GOLD ( Japanese stocks ) - REF your comment "Vronsky: Don't get too bearish on Japanese stocks at these depressed levels. Best long-term risk/reward going except for gold."
OLD GOLD, as you well know, I and a host of GOLD-EAGLE contributors ( ORACLE et al ) have been harping and carping for over one year now about Japan's being between a Rock & A Hardspot for numerous well-documented reasons. We have given exhaustive supporting arguments, including numbers, tables, graphs for our views on the Nippon dilema.
Your infintely brief observation and implication that Japanese stocks might NOT deserve an extreme bearish opinion does NOT do justice to your analytical ability... and might even offend those Kitco amd GOLD-EAGLE thinkers who are always open to well-thought out arguments. But should you have the time, I challenge you to present your OP-ED position, which I will post at GOLD-EAGLE, AND OF COURSE YOU POST IT AT KITCO.
As an "old-dog" student of the markets, I am always willing to learn. Other than a rapidly plunging Nikkei value, I see little to warrant a comparison with GOLD's HISTORICALLY unprecedented RISK/REWARD RATIO. Am I missing something... pray tell?
for KO - good point on Prime R. However, eps must reflect byproduct
credit for Silver. - ( ie 12 mill oz - or 12 *6.3/300= 250,000 oz of
gold equivalent ) - problem with prime appeard to be low reserves of
gold. However they do have good cash levels. Cant get a fix on
ag reserves
for laryn - Easy to do Kloof and Vaal as soon as get set up on spread sheet.
Donald -- That post was impressive -- the Kondratiev wave in a nutshell.
If you can, please see if you can help us with some sort of early warning system we can use while us more adventursome Gold bugs ( like me ) try to ride the Gold Bug Gold Stock Tsunami! I think the Gold stocks will do very well right now as long as we are in an inflationary trend in the US.
But -- that Chaos/turbulence/froth/firestorm etc of deflation will hit all paper money when it hits. After the deflationary bubble pops, gold stocks will be safe again.
All I can think of doing is to watch the US dollar. As long as it is stable, I would guess that the gold stocks are a safe ride.
Ideas for those adventursome gold bugs who are not satisfied with physical gold?
One thing I've learned from reviewing cycles is that war/strife is a natural part of human existence, whether we like to admit it or not....
But we must never give up hope for the better, and we must never stop learning.
A little holiday comment -- no -- I'm stone sober!
Here's to the future of human kind -- that we overcome our current crisis -- and reach for the stars!
The following listing does not cover all projects, but only those that may have development potential.
1. Moorkie - Litte Darling Creek, Golden Cross Resources NL.
Early stage exploration: rock chip sampling running up to 8.02 g/t platimum, 35.5 g/t palladium.
2. Mulga Springs, Golden Cross Resources NL.
Drilling and bulk sampling: up to 4m@ 5.1 g/t platimum. 120 Kg sample went 19.6 g/t platinium, 50 g/t palladium, 3 g/t rhodium, 3g/t osmium, 2 g/t ruthenium, 4.7 g/t iridium.
3. Syerston, Uranium Australia NL.
52Mt @ 0.762% Ni, 0.13% Co: 20 Mt @ 0.81% Ni, 1.18% Co, 0.37 g/t Pt.
38.3 Mt @ 2.07 Cr.
4. Giles Complex.
Undeveloped due to Aboriginal land claim. Possible future VERY LARGE resource. This is a major virginal ultramafic province. Numerous long pending applicant, including Delta Gold Nl.
5. Copper Hills, Australian Paltinum Mines Nl. LkAmN
The following listing does not cover all projects, but only those that may have development potential.
1. Moorkie - Litte Darling Creek, Golden Cross Resources NL.
Early stage exploration: rock chip sampling running up to 8.02 g/t platimum, 35.5 g/t palladium.
2. Mulga Springs, Golden Cross Resources NL.
Drilling and bulk sampling: up to 4m@ 5.1 g/t platimum. 120 Kg sample went 19.6 g/t platinium, 50 g/t palladium, 3 g/t rhodium, 3g/t osmium, 2 g/t ruthenium, 4.7 g/t iridium.
3. Syerston, Uranium Australia NL.
52Mt @ 0.762% Ni, 0.13% Co: 20 Mt @ 0.81% Ni, 1.18% Co, 0.37 g/t Pt.
38.3 Mt @ 2.07 Cr.
4. Giles Complex.
Undeveloped due to Aboriginal land claim. Possible future VERY LARGE resource. This is a major virginal ultramafic province. Numerous long pending applicant, including Delta Gold Nl.
5. Copper Hills, Australian Paltinum Mines Nl.
Early stage exploration, assays up to 8 oz
Vronsky:UBS=Union Bank of Switzerland
I could use that option on my gold stocks this year. You are right on, the PR moves won't do them any good. They will need to make serious moves. I agree with Vronsky, the serious moves will need to negatively impact the U.S. dollar. When that happens gold will move strongly.
I use to think that gold would move up slowly and then sort of surprise folks, now my thinking is that the move will be strong and fast, and gold's move will shock people.
What is this? Is this real?
When they realized looking around the room that what they collectively held in their hands was in the tens of thousands I sat back and said it is good.
The word precious took on a new meaning. I said now that you have touched real worth will any of you accept paper?
Fast audience, paper was repugnant to one and all.
Give me the children and the children's children and the world is mine.
Find out more about Kitco at info@kitco.com, or call 1-800-363-7053.
Copyright © 1996 Kitco Minerals & Metals Inc.
Bart thank you for this site because it has challenged my thinking and changed my life.