Gold Bullion Coins Now Subsidized?
By Scott Olmsted
Had a chat with my old friend Burt Blumert of Camino Coin about the gold bullion market. Burt notes that the premiums of most bullion coins have risen substantially over the price of gold: St. Gaudens have risen over the past year from $450 to $480 while the price of gold has fallen; British sovereigns ( slightly under 1/4 ounce of gold ) used to cost him about $1 over melt, now they cost him $9 over melt, a 12-15% premium; other European gold bullion coins now carry 6-8% premiums over their gold content.
Silver has gone even crazier. A bag of junk silver was available at spot in May, about $3500, meaning no premium over the value of the silver contained; now a bag is $4400 and silver itself hasn't changed. Clearly, the demand from Y2K preparers has pushed up junk silver. Like other supplies, such as dehydrated food, there is only so much junk silver to be had. Much has been melted over the years and with the price of silver low for long periods, the market in it has grown thin.
I think the same thing is happening to gold. Enough people are buying British sovereigns to push their premium up. The price of gold is unaffected because it is determined in a different market. In that market central banks have been selling thousands of tons of gold. The Y2K demand has not made an impact. What it has done is put the US Mint on double shifts producing American one ounce golden eagles. That's where your bargain is right now: US Eagles and Canadian Maple Leafs, both sold at a small premium over gold content. I just bought some more Eagles for $311 apiece when gold was about $296.50; you do the math. Burt calls this price "subsidized" because the US Mint is not recognizing the premium that bullion coins are fetching elsewhere in the world.
The price of gold is manipulated by central government sales and loans of their stocks. I'm not alone in believing that the price is being held artificially low by these actions and that someday, perhaps in the near future, we will see much higher prices.
In recent months an absolute epidemic of all-knowing has hit media pundits of all ranks!With events in Washington, DC lighting up talkradio lines and soundstages across the dials, never before have so many professed to be speaking for so many. The phrase "The American people..." [usually followed by "believe", "have decided", "want", or "understand"] has become the chant of the channels.
"The American people have thought about this long and hard," barked George Stephanopoulos on ABC. "The American people do want all of those things, except in moderation," smarted Cokie Roberts. "The American people would actually like some sort of HMO reform." "The American people have said, yes, that's perjury," declared Sam Donaldson.
"I give the American people a great deal of credit... If the American people thought it out your way...
[And that was all just in the spread of few minutes!]
In fact, a DRUDGE REPORT crunch of all words spoken during this weekend's
five national Sunday morning programs reveals that the phrase "The American people" was used 38 times!
Top know-it-all went to outgoing White House Rahm Emanuel, appearing on CBS'FACE THE NATION:
"The American people have lost faith in this process..."
"The American people and their needs..."
"The American people have seen..."
"It is about the concerns of the American people."
Pause.
"The American People" total usage by hosts, sidekicks and guests:
FOX SUNDAY: 13
ABC's WEEK: 10
CNN's LATE: 06
CBS' FACE: 05
NBC'S MEET: 04
Throw in programs rotating on MSNBCFOXNEWSCNBCCSPAN this weekend and there were literally hundreds of outbreaks of "The American people..."
Not one for "The American Sheeple!"
[They save that for the green rooms.]
technically when a market tags resistance 4 times and loses it is ususually bad news, but perhaps in gold's case it is merely doomed to perpetuate the 295-305 channel until, until when?
http://www.marketprojections.com
Permission has been given for others to use my username and password assigned for the free trial period ( write these down for later use )
Username: hixson
Password: thmetal
Daily and weeky cycle projections:
http://commerce.marketprojections.com:443/comod/gifs/gold.gif
http://commerce.marketprojections.com:443/comod/gifs/silver.gif
http://commerce.marketprojections.com:443/comod/gifs/platinum.gif
http://commerce.marketprojections.com:443/comod/wkly/gold.gif
http://commerce.marketprojections.com:443/comod/wkly/silver.gif
http://commerce.marketprojections.com:443/comod/wkly/platinum.gif
Elliott Wave Analysis, including resistance and support levels:
http://www.marketprojections.com/samplecom.htm
The following is quoted from Colin Alexander's Five Star Bulletin:
"The fed is the problem, not the solution.
'To paraphrase Gresham's law: bad protection drives out good. To attempt to
protect the consumer by force undercuts the protection he gets from incentive...
it grants an automatic protection ( though in fact unachievable ) gaurentee of
safety from the products of any company that complies with its arbitrarily set
standards.'
Since the 1982 bailout of Mexico, bad protection has been the stock in trade of
federal reserve. Now the Fed appears to be trying to bail out the entire world,
including all of the japanese banking system, deadbeat hedge funds and the instit-
tions that lent money to them, possibly including Lehman and Bankers Trust.
Common sense says that this kind of rescue is merely an exercise in putting
ever bigger fuses into the system so that in due course not the fuse but the entire
system is endangered. The author of our opening quotation identified the challenge
of regulation correctly, except that at the time he was writing about product protection
rather than the service protection of banking.
And the author of this common sense was none other than the current Fed chair-
man Alan Greenspan. Once an associatte of Ayn Rand, the quotation comes from his
August 1963 essay The Assault of Integrity, published in a collection of essays
titled Ayn Rand Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.
Ayn Rand's books and her philosophy were based on the view that capitolism
unfettered contains the means to correct its own excesses. Only by governments est-
ablishing through legislation monopolies in any area of the economy would they not
be self-correcting.
If this seems an extreme view, let's look further at Greenspan the pre-Fed theoritician
had to say about how tthe boom of the 1920s came to an end. This quotation comes
from Greenspan's 1966 essay Gold and Economic freedom:
'When busines in the United States underwent a mild correction in 1927, the
Federal Reserve created more paper reserves in the hope of forestalling any possible
bank reserve shortage. More disastrous, however was the Federal Reserve's attempt
toassist Great Britain who had been losing gold to us because the Bank of England refused
to allow interest rates to rise when market forces dictated it ( it was politically unpalatable ) .
The reasoning of the authorities involved was as follows: if the federal Reserve
pumped excessive paper reserves into American Banks, interest rates in the United States
would fall to alevel comparable with those in Great Britain; this would act to stop Britain's
gold loss and avoid the political embarassment of having to raise interest rates.
'The Fed succeded: it stopped the gold loss, but it nearly destroyed the economies
of the world in the process. The excess credit which the Fed pumped into the economy spilled
over into the stock market triggering a fantastic speculative boom. Belatedly, Federal
Reserve official attempted to sop up the excess reserves and finally succeeded in breaking
the boom. But it was too late: by 1929 the speculative imbalance had become so overwhelming
that the attempt precipitated a sharp retrenching and demoralizing of confidence.
As a result the American economy collapsed.'
Greenspan suggests that the mild business contraction in 1927 should have been allowed
to run its mildly painful course in order to purge from the economy relatively minor
excesses that had become unsustainable. Instead, the Fed continued to feed money into
the system to avert the consequences of over-expansion. The result as we all know
was the bust that began mid-year 1929. When the economy topped out, selling
pressure overtook buying pressure on the stock exchange and stocks went down.
As stocks went down, the so-called wealth effect went into reverse. People who had
previosly felt richer and more able to buy goods because their investments were
more valuable, now drew in their horns.
There is nothing magical about this. It is simply the way that the free enterprise system works.
Free enterprise means having the freedom to start a business, however hare-brained
the idea. This freedom axiomatically implies the right to fail. Remove the right to fail by arbitrary
means of any kind and you virtually guarentee the kind of lack of success from
which Russia is trying to emerge.
The immensity of the problem in Japan was described in FWN news rport we
received on October 15.
'The Japanese commercial banks are gearing up to reduce lending, primarily
to maintain capital adequacy ratios, according to areport today in the Nikkei newspaper.
'The report said not only are major banks refraining from making new loans,
they intend to recover as many outstanding loans as possible in the remainder of
the fiscal year. Outstanding bank loans shrank 2.7% year on year in September,
the report quoted the Bank of Japan as saying.
'Large writ-offs of bad loans have eroded banks capital bases, and falling stock prices
appear to have swollen unrealized losses on their stockholdings. On top of this, Japanese
banks are having trouble raising funds on the money market...
'Conditions are even worse overseas. The report quoted Satoru Kishi, president
of Bank Tokyo-Mitsubishi, as saying Japanese banks at one stage found it impossible
to raise funds at all on th interbank capital market in early October, since banks lowered credit lines.'"
Scary!
She's a speedy machine, now, Bart; thanks.
We've had a good shakedown at $300. Would somebody please change gears and see if Bart's machine will now take $340?
Normally dropping interest rates stimulate the gold market -- rising interest rates in the absence of inflation certainly inhibit it.
My guestion to you is this: Just how much do US interest rates have to drop before the gold markets are stimulated? Could be alot more than one might expect.
Problem is -- we are not in a normal ( average ) situation worldwide -- with credit/financial collapses occuring all over the world. Few of us have experience with such a situation, because it occurs so rarely.
And -- the 'powers that be' are ( desperately? ) using the price of gold to keep the US dollar where they want it -- for the sake of international trade.
What will it take for this use of gold to support the US dollar to end? My guess is that it will take a serious run on the US dollar, or US stock markets before gold bullion will be free to reach equilibrium. Alternatively, when the gold bullion trading volume rises to rival the US dollar trading volume, AG et all will no longer be able to use the 'thin' gold market to control the US dollar.
When the 'powers that be' have given up on using gold to control the US dollar, then we will have our rally -- not before.
SHAREFIN - I had not heard about the Allstate/IBM deal. 18,000 AS/400s sold to only one company? A few of the IBM sales guys are probably retired, lounging on the Carribean right now
Who the hell is going to install all of that hardware for Allstate in the next year? IF ( and thats a VERY BIG IF ) the hardware is in place, what about Allstates software? Networks? Data? And were suppose to be in Good Hands??
To those that arent familiar with this stuff, an AS/400 is a old proprietary dinosaur system that IBM sells to anyone that wants a mainframe, but cant afford it. Cheaper client/server technology passed the old AS/400s long ago, but IBM has some of the best sales folks on the planet!
An analogy: Could you imagine a company trying to move all of their software and data from 18,000 old PCs to new ones in the next year? And of course, these AS/400s are more complicated.
FOR ALLSTATE ALONE, say that each one costs $50,000 for the hardware ( low estimate ) , $10,000 to install the hardware ( low estimate ) , and $25,000 ( 250 hours - low estimate ) to move the data and applications to the new hardware. Thats $2.4B, yes, Billion with a "B" JUST FOR THE NEW HARDWARE. Now lets talk about fixing the applications and data, such as Payroll, HR, General Ledger....
Could also be that the insiders know something's up -- and the IMF bailout of Brazil is going to fail. Can't say the IMF track record has been particularly stellar in achieving more than help some financial types bail out, without solving any of the longer term problems.
Anyone know the details of the Brazil bailout? Is the pending injection of funds by the IMF sufficient to prevent an imminent financial collapse? When is this to happen?
I'm not too worried about just Argentinan gold sales -- but if this is a sign that all of South America is about to repeat the SEAsia financial crisis bit -- we should get out of all equities, and hunker down for Ping III.
TIA
It does not matter how much the premium is on gold coins, and how much gold coin buying is going on -- that may be a sign of what is to come, but it does not tell us which way gold will go tomorrow.
Personally, I will feel much better about investing in gold equities after the next major deflationary/debt collapse event. Not now.
But -- if the US dollar continues to drop -- gold will look better. Unlikely, since other countries the world over seem poised to reduce rates as well. So -- the US dollar has probably dropped as much as it will for some time -- IMHO.
The $A-$US Gold comparison charts have just been updated at the website. Both charts are in very tight distribution patterns that cannot be maintained much longer. In particular, Gold has been in a $US 4.00 range ( $US 296-300 ) ever since September 30.
We know that it is getting harder to borrow money in the U.S.. We know that Mr Greenspan is VERY concerned about the collateral valuation underpinning existing U.S. bank loans - he has told us so. And we know that the markets are expecting still more Fed rate cuts, the next "official" chance to do so being the next FOMC meeeting on November 17.
And we know that when the collateral valuations behind bank loans goes bad, no amount of interest rate tinkering will redress the situation. Picture, if you will, a "reverse" Tug of War. That's what the Fed is engaged in at present.
Meanwhile, meeting in Oporto ( Portugal ) the Heads of State of the Latin American nations have called for an IMF "contingency fund" to stave off collapse, on the basis that they ( the Latin American nations ) are the "world's last line of defense against a 'grave global recession'."
See this Nando Times article:
http://www2.nando.net/newsroom/ntn/biz/101898/biz1_7694_noframes.html
The event that is said to have triggered Gold's latest fall from $US 300 is a rumour that Argentina is about to sell its "Gold reserves". Of course, while these rumours are being bandied about, Argentina is one of the Latin American nations in Oporto pressing for an "IMF contingency fund" to make sure they don't go under, no matter what they sell off.
U.S. banks weren't greatly exposed to Asia. They weren't greatly exposed to Russia either, but the hedge funds were, and the U.S. banks were exposed to them. But U.S. banks ARE greatly exposed to Latin America. The camel is getting a very sore back. Mr Greenspan has every right to be worried.
For my vote I offer organized crime, the mafia.
It is important to know ones enemies. I think the purpose for the suppression of POG is for ease
of accumulation of same. Now some postulates: what is the wealthiest entity on earth. Organized crime.
What entity is cross generational enough to plot a 40 year conspiracy to bring about a one world government? Uh huh organized crime. If anyone has read any of my other posts you know I fully believe Y2K is a planned event, that will precipitate martial law worldwide. It will wipe all financial ledgers clean
and yeild chaos and anarchy. The mafia definitely holds Russia in its pocket. Isn't this well known. Look at their gambit for getting gold. Gonna make coins out of it huh? Wait until after the mid term elections to see Clinton's real character. These midterms may well be the last national elections here in the states so don't think he is worried about handing over an in tact democratic party to Al Gore.
If you assume a different world post Y2K, if you assume Clinton is a pawn to the worldwide organized crime efforts to establish one world government, then can you believe every downturn in the
Dow will be bought back up, and every measure necessary including using large hedge funds that suck the liquidity out of world governments forcing CBs to sell gold to protect their currencies will continue to happen and become more extreme after the elections.
Yeah this isn't a fully developed treatise and you can say I am full of it. I am only pulling together intuitively all that I have read here and elsewhere on the internet. I would even like to be proven conclusively to be wrong so I can rest my worries.
I have one very important question that I have asked before in this forum. When CBs sell, who buys? To say boullion dealers is not an answer. Who are the boullion dealers ? C'mon people their is just a given quantity of gold on this planet. If what was formerly so widely held by CB is now not so largely held by banks who then is accumulating gold. Answer that and you will know who is suppressing the price of Gold.
Find out more about Kitco at info@kitco.com, or call 1-800-363-7053.
Copyright © 1996 Kitco Minerals & Metals Inc.
Thx again !!
Chicken man