The question is, will we go in to anaphylactic shock eventualy? :- ) )
The biggest difference is that Euro conversion project was mostly application software modification, Y2K requires a significant hardware/Operating system replacement and mods, including embedded chips in control devices.
While we are on Y2K, I have to join the crowd of people with moderate views. Y2K will not be the end of society as we know it. Most of my money will stay where they are, and while I'll be probably sailing in some remote location, it's not because of Y2K.
As far as Y2K influence on gold and financial markets, there will be a psychological impact, but don't hope that Y2K alone will drive the price of gold through the roof.
JMHO for whatever it's worth.
Find out more about Kitco at info@kitco.com, or call 1-800-363-7053.
Copyright © 1996 Kitco Minerals & Metals Inc.
Bear with me .. and remember that I HOPE there is
a 20,000 ton short position too .. Id prefer 50,000.
But I fail to see how a man that wants to borrow
money fails to see this opportunity .. and I fail to
see how a bullion bank that wants to obtain a 5 %
return on its gold also fails to see this at the same
time ...
Assumptions
a. gold = $300
b. lease rate = 1.5%
c. forward rate = 3.5%
d. sum of lease and forward = 5%
1. A man wants to borrow about $300..
2. He goes to bullion bank and leases gold at
1 1/2 percent ..
3. He then has an obligation to return one oz of gold
to bank in one year.
4. He immediately sells gold back to bank for 300
minus the lease cost ( $4.5 ) .. he has $295.5
bank has $4.5.
5. Next step to avoid any risk on the price of gold
rising over the year .. he buys one oz of gold
forward ( from the SAME BANK ) at $300 Plus the forward
rate .. the gold costs him 300 + ( 300*.035 ) = 310.5
in one year. ( he may have to deposit 10%
but I assume he will not )
6. One year passes .. he returns to the bank and
returns $310.5 for his oz of gold.
7. The bank gives him his oz. Then he gives it back
to settle his loan.
Note .. Gold NEVER really left bank. Borrower's
cost was ( 10.5 + 4.5 ) /300 = 5%
.. neither bank nor borrower had any risk associated
with the gold price.
Gold returned the same 5 % to bank .. If the bank
wishes to enter into a slightly riskier deal ..
they can DO THE SAME THING AGAIN WITH THE SAME OZ.
... please find my mistake !! I dont think gold
is such a sterile asset after all.