Cage Rattler ( Y2K and the Euro conversion success ) ID#33182:
Given that the Euro conversion process is commonly acknowledged to have been about 5 times larger ( approx 6 times larger budget ) than Y2K,..."
Wow, I was not aware of that at all. It certainly is not either my acknowlegement or experience. Can you cite some sources for this "common acknowlegement?" Perhaps you mean, what has been spent IN EUROPE has been 5 times greater than what has been budgeted ( or spent ) SO FAR IN EUROPE for Y2k? That I could believe. But Worldwide effect? Euro 5 times Y2k? I have my doubts, but since Euro conversion costs are "in and counted", then we can see in approx 511,200 minutes how much Y2k will weigh in at.
Personally, we have not had to convert our software at all for Euro, since, today, all Petroleum trades in USD, but have about 2.5 man years in on Y2K, and ours is easier than most! Should all of a sudden, we need to change the base currency to be in EURO, the total cost would be ( drumroll ) probably less than one man month. But this is only one system, and not representative of the world-at-large.
I really hope that I am wrong on Y2k and that it is a short term problem. I have bought 40% silver coin so that in the event that there is a downturn post Y2k in the event of a "non-event", that I cannot lose more than the face value. I enjoy reading your posts.
mozel ( @Irrationality ) ID#153110:
Copyright 1998 mozel/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
Am I mistaken or are we in an era now when the predictive value of fundamentals has become unreliable? What I perceive is that across the board intervention and participation by governments in markets by regulatory and financial means is much more pervasive than is commonly admitted." ... "The possibility that markets are no longer free enough to behave like free markets is simply too awful to face.
And so the myth of an exhuberant bubble is substituted instead. A mania of human action is a kind of irrationality we can cope with. The kind of irrationality which government management of economies produces is not."
I'll tell you what I think, Mozel. That is deep down, we *know* that these institutions are run by people, and that people are not as yet perfect. And it is our innate understanding of the human condition that allows us to lend less-than-omnipotent status to our institutions. I guess it all depends on the time frame. Long term might be greater than my lifetime. Since ideas can live longer than humans, they are important to pay attention to.
You appear to be throwing in the towel, intimating that the power of the government to control the financial affairs of the world is complete. It may be, and your thought about denial is well asked. Are you merely becoming a realist?
NEVER LISTEN TO ENVY FOR INVESTMENT ADVICE
-------
EU Parliament wants to sack commission
Monday, 11 January 1999 15:59 ( GMT )
( UPI Focus )
EU Parliament wants to sack commission
STRASBOURG, France, Jan. 11 ( UPI ) - European Commission President
Jacques Santer is trying to persuade the European Parliament to
reconsider a scheduled censure motion that would effectively dump all 20
European Commissioners.
At issue are the mounting charges of corruption, financial
mismanagement and cronyism - particularly on the part of the French and
Spanish commissioners - that have the European Parliament locked in
heated pre-vote debate over the scandal.
Members of parliament have already demanded that key individual
commissioners acknowledge the corruption problems within their own
departments and resign.
The commission runs EU policy day to day and with an official censure
vote set for Thursday, the stakes are high.
The push for censure was triggered after parliament voted last month
against signing off the EU's 1996 accounts.
That vote effectively questioned the Commission's financial
competence amid broadening mismanagement and fraud allegations in EU
programs.
All 20 commissioners will sit before parliament in a pre-vote debate
in Strasbourg tonight, after rushing from meeting the German government
in Bonn.
Spanish Commission Vice-President Manuel Marin, and his French
colleague, Edith Cresson, who is charge of EU research funding, have
been singled out in the scandal.
Among the charges being leveled against the EC officials are
allegations that millions of dollars in humanitarian aid were assigned
to nonexistent projects.
There are also charges that commission members directed financial
favors toward friends and that financial records were destroyed.
The entire commission is at risk because the European Parliament has
only the power to sack the entire commission - not individual
commissioners.
At this time, Parliamentary leaders are asking Santer to force Marin
and Cresson to resign.
But Santer admits only that management of the EU'sc executive body is
flawed, and has resisted calls to force individuals to go.
--
Copyright 1999 by United Press International
All rights reserved
-------------
Anyone have any info on what is happening? Sounds pretty big if these 20 commisioners who are about to be fired are the keepers of the fledgling EURO. What I don't understand is the timing. Would have expected a honey moon period of some kind with the EURO before trouble.
If my suspicions are accurate, something really big is about to surface in Europe.
Can anyone dig up anything else? Could be we are about to repeat the events of 1993 when gold equities doubled in a few months -- also due to a European currency crisis. We must be very careful, however, and figure out what kind of crisis is brewing. A gold up crisis -- or a gold down crisis?
Comments? Major crisis, or minor crisis?
Delphi ?
If true it is phenomenal and could explain rise in gold. Could anyone check
the math on the 99.6 billion Euro = to 30% reserves????
http://talk.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-7203311
"According to the opening financial statement of the Eurosystem
on 1 January 1999, the most important single item on the asset side
of the Eurosystem's balance sheet was external assets. The net
position in foreign currency... amounted to EUR 227.4
billion,whereby assets of EUR 237.0 billion were opposed to
liabilities of EUR 9.6 billion. These figures refer to non-euro area
currencies, since euro area currency denominated foreign exchange
positions held on 31 December 1998 were transformed
automatically into domestic positions through the transition to
Stage Three... In addition, the stock of gold ( asset item 1 ) of the
Eurosystem amounted to EUR 99.6 billion."
"The consolidated opening financial statement of the Eurosystem
reflects the initial valuation of the assets and liabilities of the
Eurosystem. According to the harmonised accounting rules for the
Eurosystem, gold, foreign exchange, security holdings and
financial instruments of the Eurosystem will be revalued at market
rates and prices at the end of each quarter."
Though it will take awhile for analysts, commentators, traders and
investors to sort out the full implications of this press release, there are
certain policy statements inferred in the financial statement that literally
jump off the page. Prior to this statement by ECB, few understood that
reserves would be presented as a consolidated balance sheet of all the
respective national central banks. This symbolically signals a uniformity
and centrality in the economic structure and policy making that comes as
a surprise. Prior to the release of this ECB statement, the best work I
had seen done on how reserves, particularly gold reserves were to be
handled, was published by the World Gold Council. In that they
assumed a gold allocation of 784 tons and said that that would be the
15% allocation frequently discussed. Now we find that because of the
consolidation, the ECB has upped the component to over 12,000 tons
and that it comprises 30.45% of a very large overall number. The Wall
Street Journal reported this morning a figure of 15% but this is incorrect,
and they totally missed what appears to be the most important aspect of
the ECB's action, i.e., they have included all national reserves in ECB
reserves including all the gold in Europe. Beyond the numbers, as I infer,
as investors we must also consider the implications of the sheer size of
this reserve and what message Europe is trying to deliver in presenting
their financial position in this way.
We will leave that for further consideration as the euro process moves
ahead. Suffice it to say, that this blows a hole in the theory that Europe
will be divided over gold and that the national central banks can
somehow undermine the gold price. Policy clearly resides with the
central bank and the central bank has been very clear about is opposition
to gold sales despite what those on the short of the market are telling us.
Though I doubt the mainstream press will give up on this idea in the
months and weeks ahead, my view is that is that the ECB announcement
is a very strong opening volley in the upcoming monetary wars and
perhaps yesterday's strong move was the first indication how
Euro-policies could affect the gold market. To put the matter in terms of
physics, the Europeans have converted the weak force to a strong force
binding those countries. We should not underestimate what that might
mean to our portfolios.
Find out more about Kitco at info@kitco.com, or call 1-800-363-7053.
Copyright © 1996 Kitco Minerals & Metals Inc.
Envy, yep, that's the way I see it too. Smart money pays attention to both financial history and current world events and doesn't think itself so smart it can pick exact tops and bottoms, just the general neighborhoods. With all the standard valuation measures pegged hard on the SELL end of scale for the equity markets, and on the BUY end for PM's, well then that's what you do and don't worry if you miss out on the last 10% or even 25% of the mania. Or get hit for some losses in your new investments because you didn't guess the exact bottom. Ride it out because you're ahead of the thundering crowd, waiting for them to catch up and push your stuff to the moon. That's why I don't like time sensitive trading devices like options too much because you can get killed waiting for things to turn around. Ditto with buying on margin.
Someday, we'll both be very, very rich! Unless, of course, we're all delusional because we're betting against the Fed, WJC, and the biggest stock bull in bistory. Could go either way, I guess ;- )
Re the Euro being a dry run for Y2K, I thought the best analysis of the whole concept was Westergaard's contention that Euro efforts would hamper Y2K remediation and should be delayed till after rollover, something he knew would not be done due to political considerations. I must admit, I thought there would be some short term problems with the Euro but we haven't even seen that. I still think the first big stuff we'll see is on April Fool's day ( how appropriate! ) when Japan, Canada, and New York roll over to FY '00. Nothing catastrophic then, just bureacratic systems failing and gumming up the works. Kinda like the the teaser for the pregame show scheduled for July 1 when most of the States follow suit.
Kickoff for Y2K proper will Oct 1 when the Feds hit it. Things should be getting pretty interesting by that time. 60 Minutes grilling some government flunky, er, spokesperson, on why Medicare and AFDC keeled over
and stayed over when they'd promised all along that all mission critical systems would be fixed in time, panicky welfare recipients and retirees demanding their entitlements, Republicans blaming Democrats and vice versa, programmers failing to show up for work anymore, etc.