What is the value of one ounce when a person or a CB owns several hundred or several million ounces compared to a person's precious first ounce? It is that first ounce that commands the premium. Just as the first beer may be worth $5 but the twelfth may be worth 50 cents.
Again I reiterate the need to have a DeBeers style campaign to sell just one ounce to each person {and through them to each of their children}. And screw the World Gold Council. If you want a job done you have to do it yourself. As one poor humble person I can not. But the Kitcoites with their contacts throughout the world and throughout the industry CAN! Preaching to fellow gold bugs has not do it. Tens or hundreds of millions of people each buying a one ounce millenium investment could.
Three billion people, each with one HALF ounce, would absorb the entire WORLD's GOLD STOCKS. The value of that first precious half ounce may very well be four digits in current US$.
``But US pension funds are beginning to see the value of gold as a portfolio diversifier, buying about 50 tonnes last year,'' Richard Scott Ram, a World Gold Council economist, said Friday.
Some well known Canadian funds have purchased gold as a portion of their portfolio over the last year and had been given nothing but grief from Brokers and investors. Me not included. I suppose the pressure for quick returns means managers cannot position themselves as they see fit. Also, it seems when the price is right - money managers will buy gold ( despite all the negative connotations thrown at the yellow stuff over the years ) .
Hang in there people!
I spent a few days in the detention cubicle adjacent to the asst. principal's office for trouncing my English teacher in a mannerly debate. I saw Nixon speak for him.
Only the KKK, the John Birchers, the US out of the UN crowd, were acknowledged to support him.
That was when I got a handle on the media manipulation that is the handmaiden ( read whores ) , for the powers that be. ( read LORAL now, or, then TFX ) , or, in this space ( name your favorite transnational corporation )
The guy attacked me at every opportunity. I tried again and again to make informative and interesting posts, and this guy kept coming at me, for nothing else than hear his own voice. Should we repost his blather? Perhaps your memories are short, but the past is contained with these pages. I you feel like passing judgment, go back and read how he came at me swinging both fists from the start. The posts are there, time and again attacking me. I didnt even post for more than two weeks, nary a word or a toot. Yet farfel choose to make a crappy remark about me, or five, or ten every day.
I like this site, I read this site. How would any of you feel, if you did not even post, and some vigilante was every day bullying you? Every one of you would either stand up to it or go away. I choose to stand. This has always proven to be the wisest course with bullies. Im sorry he couldnt keep up and he buried his credibility with every word he wrote, but this was a fight that he picked and prosecuted with great relish.
I was going to leave this alone, hes gone now, right? But farfel fans are creating a spin on this that is patently untrue.
I offered peace to farfel and acted as I promised he rejected peace for rancor.
Lets look at my proffer:
http://www.kitcomm.com/comments/gold/1998q2/1998_05/980503.201824.rjeeeeeee.htm
His response to my earnest offer and apology was to insult me in his usual grand style, accepting my apology, offering none of his own, but choosing instead to lecture me like some smug grandfather.
http://www.kitcomm.com/comments/gold/1998q2/1998_05/980503.234338.farfeleee.htm
Pardon me for the enormous satisfaction of not seeing this blowhard again.
Any one of you, treated as I was by him, would feel the same.
Maybe I should leave because Henry D doesnt have the stomach for this. He does however seem to have a Buddha sized stomach when it comes to tolerating farfels snipes at me. Henry, I dont miss your respect, you are not a fair man. I would not choose to associate with you in any case. Your admonishments to me fall on deaf ears. Where were your words of slime when farfel was attacking me daily?
There are many, in fact most, people on this site who dont agree with my views on gold. Yet, I am able to carry on lengthy discourse for months on end, with plenty of friendly jabs on both sides, so it can hardly be said that I am intolerant of those that disagree, yes?
For all you who would blast me and my "slimy" remarks: If you have not read these two posts, you know not of what you speak. Am I to feel guilty because this guy picked a fight, and picked, and picked, and picked until I stepped up and stomped him? It was what he was asking for and what he roundly deserved, as do all bullies.
As for Farfel, good riddance to bad garbage.
And I have zero respect for anyone who would defend this angry little child.
Besides.. Hell be back to respond to this. He has to have the last word.
He is not done being a martyr.
Yes
For all you pleading to the martyr, how about following the lead of sharfin and ask that he returns and sets his attacking ways aside? If he comes back at me again, we will both be thrown off. Count on it.
Yes
Yet they did not voice the same when I was under siege
This was no puppy dog
This was a boastful, prideful man who shouted YALE!
And attacked me at every turn
I would love to leave this behind
I should follow every post canonizing farfel with a post of farfels own words proving he was a willing and wanton aggressor. I think he is used to feeling as if he wins the argument. A couple months ago he spoke of pitching a guy gold at a cocktail party. I sell the stuff for a living, and I wouldn't dream of selling gold at a party. So he lost one and slunk away.
Since all predictions have been tarnished this week, perhaps we could hearken back to a prediction I made a month ago that "Farfel will dry up and blow away". I hope he stays away for all time; until the mountains wash into the sea and our sun slowly dims in the void.
Think Ive had enough of this place for awhile too.
Indeedy
That Rocky could'nt abide
Farley came at Rocky
And Rocky set him aside
awaytoask EB how his plats are doing..........
---------------------------------------------
Well ERLE....thanks for asking. My plats took a right beating last week.....in case you weren't watching. I will still be holding some rather worthless ( they will be worth less than I payed ) July options upon expiry ( maybe ) . I, like many, ( or some, don't really care who ) thought we were ready for the big run of the year. It will be postponed a bit, eh? I do not mind so much because I have been using ( LARGE ) profits from last years Platinum BULL & Gold BEAR runs............ ( LARGE ) .
ERLE ( the pearl ) , if you are not in Platinum at this point or at some point in the VERY near future then that is your decision and a right one at that...... ( for every decision you make on your own is a right one regardless if it makes you money or not ) . I, EB, ( Eric to those who know me ) will be sooooooooo heavily DEEP into October Platinum that I may drown because it will be WELL past my ankles/shins/knees/nipples and EARS.
I am trading Platinum for a number of reasons. Platinum's average low ( in none critical years ) is $381.00. Platinum's average is $447.00 and Platinum's high is $512.00. The average price swing ( in one trading year ) is $131.00. That represents a SIGNIFICANT move and SIGNIFICANT possibilities for profit. I WILL PROFIT AGAIN in PLATINUM. ( period ) . btw.......Plat is unlike gold in both price swing and supply/demand features. I would rather be in Plat than gold right now ( period ) ( . ) .
One concern I do have is when John D spoke of his jeans....er genes.....and said his work brings plat to 330-340. BUT, that is a HUGE bargain and I will buy there too......HEAVILY ( ! )
IN SHORT: I LOVE plat at these prices.....I bought Oct. Friday and will be buying MORE next week as I watch it unfold ( down or up ) . We might be sitting in front of our 'putas on Sunday afternoon ( CAL time ) watching this thingy unfold........and that would break my heart............................. ( NOT ) .
Thanks for asking ERLE...............uh huh.
away........to feel comfort in *knowing*
deep&deeper&deeperYet
i can see clearly now the rain is gone
i can see all obstacles in my way
gone are the dark clouds that had me blind
it's gonna be a bright, bright sunshiny day!
away....to the weekend
goodbye F*......you will be back.......guar-an-damn-tee!
As is common, the problem is not the argument, it is the premise. Who says that laws should "benefit" society as a whole? Some issues, such as personal freedom and rights, go beyond quantitative measures of "benefit". It would "benefit" society to "terminate" or at least "sterilize" physically "defective" children.
Once you change the postulates of the argument to a morally relativistic "benefit" issue, away from right and wrong in a more abstract moral sense, you open the Pandora's box to Brave New World, my friend.
Let's talk right and wrong here.
One oz. silver rounds are priced at spot + 5 cents, from my dealer.-delivered/ he must want to be rid of them.
The scrap silver coins will never appreciate more than a tiny percentage near scrap. +or-. One has to find a way to give them added value.
I'm working on that.
My aren't there some easily bruised egos here? Poor RJ and the unpronouncable one, have headed to the pit mines to duel to the first broken fingernail.
I don't quite get the battle of the scorpions. They might have looked over a shoulder to see that they had both made unsupportable short term calls.
We must be able to argue here. If everyone behaved as these two did in their snit, then what? :I'm looooosing interest in the ad hominem stuff.
I was just trying to contact you for an invite to "boys' weekend", where we drink beer, go out to eat some fattening food, denigrate women, and talk about ranging topics "till 3:AM .
Bring a motorcycle, 'cause it's more fun.
Then we go back to our wives, and tell them how bad it was this year.
Central Wisconsin Follies.
Ive considered waiting until the end of June before posting what Ive done, but what Ive done is a secret that not only burns like a coal in the shorts, but one Ive concluded is just plain gutless not to reveal *before* things pan out. Otherwise Id be either gloating or publicly licking my wounds. So . . . we watch this new jones market together, yes?
Heres my quandary: I want more gold. But Im broke; my investment moneys tied up in gold. So how do I get more gold?
Heres my thinking: Gold will drift sideways until at least July when the EMU makes their big announcement re. gold reserves ( that is, if its not postponed again ) . The flip side: Due to the perceived unreliability of palladium supply, manufacturers are switching to platinum. So Im looking for plat to jump next month. ( Even Im surprised to find myself aligned with RJ on this one! )
Heres some more of my thinking ( I know, dangerous stuff ) : Although the gold and platinum markets should be viewed as independent of one another, Ive been unable to ignore the ratio between the two. As of Fridays close the gold/plat ratio was just over 1.26:1 ( that is, about 63 ounces of gold buys about 50 ounces of platinum ) . Okay, thats one thing. Heres another: A ten percent rise in gold ( from $292/oz. ) is $321. A ten percent rise in platinum ( from $369/oz. ) is $406. Another thought: Both are cheap today gold seemingly perennially cheap; platinum newly cheap.
Now some fundamentals: Always bubbling to the surface of my meager gray matter is the axiom: Gold is *the* political metal ( and therefore subject to manipulation ) . And although I do believe gold will break out big with the demise of this present financial circus, I dont see it happening next month. On the other hand, platinum is one-fifteenth as scarce as gold. And whereas platinum has demonstrated more volatility than gold and therefore ( presently ) appears unlike gold to be a truly *tradable* commodity ( and per studying the charts and news and posts and such ) , I believe there exists the potential for a truly dramatic rise in plat next month.
At the time I accrued my gold holdings ( at avg. spot $292.50 ) , platinum was well over $400. Now, with gold at $292, but with plat at $369, my gold holdings *in relation to plat* are actually still in the black in fact, as good as, or better than, its ever been. In other words, my gold is worth more today *in platinum* than it was when I bought it earlier this year. ( If you can measure gold in dollars or yen, why not in platinum eagles? )
Question: What is more likely to occur in June gold to $321? or plat to $406? ( This assumes the maintenance of a 63:50 gold/plat ratio. ) Answer: I think its more likely plat will rise to $406 than gold to $321 in June.
Question: Can we look for an increase ( beyond 63:50 ) in the ratio between gold and platinum? Answer: I think so.
That said, heres what I did: I liquidated my gold holdings ( except for one ounce ) , and bought platinum. ( Ach! Heresy on a gold site! But hear me out. I *want* more gold, remember? ) The actual transaction ratio in ounces, gold/plat, ran about 64 to 50 that is, every 50 ounces of platinum cost about 64 ounces of gold ( this is washing through coin premiums partially recovered or bought, configuring a transaction unit of 64 gold to 50 plat that includes a transaction unit cost of about one ounce of gold ) .
My objective: To realize next month enough of a gain in the *ratio* of gold to platinum presumably through an increase in plat and perhaps even by a decrease in gold to do it again *in reverse* that is, sell plat for gold and thereby increase my total gold holdings.
Heres the math ( per 50 oz. plat figuring gold @ $300 ) : Plat goes to $406, youre up ( +4 ) to 68 oz. gold. Beyond $400/oz. plat, every five percent increase buys a little more than three ounces of gold. Plat up 15% @ $424 = ( +7 ) 71 oz. gold. Plat up 20% @ $443 = ( +10 ) 74 oz. gold. Etcetera ( less about one ounce of gold per 50 oz. plat transaction unit ) ...
Or not. All this of course is based on the premise that were betting to win ( not place, not show ) .
Anyway, thats the play. Just apprising you, FWIW. ( My wife would freak. The worse you guys will do is call me an idiot. *That* I can handle. )
Oh well! As we always implore: just give me one more chance God & I won't screw it up again.
http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WAPO/19980530/V000825-053098-idx.html
Aurator: Yes, like Cabbage Patch dolls, only crazier. The regular Beanies are only about a fifth the size of a Cabbage Patch doll, and these "teenie beanies" are about a third the size of THAT. If you could see one, you'd see right away the thing is only worth about eighty-nine cents in it's own right. Silverbaron had it right: It is an absolute nutty, nutty mania.
At one MacDonald's I went to this morn, the kid at the counter told me that a guy had just called in and wanting to buy 600 Happy Meals. MacDonald's turned him down.
I've already told the Missus: The next time MacDonald's wants to sell a quarter-billion burgers, fries and cokes, they can count us OUT. Don't really think she heard me though . . . unfortunately . . .
Oh, God . . . In another hour or two, I've got to make another run . . . Then two tomorrow, and two Monday . . . arghhhhhhh!
Hey! Anyone want some free burgers and fries? You'll have to pay the shipping . . . heeheehee . . . no? . . . maybe I'll drive over to the "bad" part of town and find me some homeless chaps . . .
. . . loadin' me Uzi . . .
. . . AWAY . . . boo-hoo . . .
Yesiree.
And now I find myself in Beanie Hell . . .
. . . Out of the fryin' pan . . .
Is Merkin/Merkan something that originated here at Kitco, or am I just pathetically unread and unwashed in my new Beanie lust? Does it stand for an aMERiKAN?
Merkin . . . she ain't in my dictionary.
danke.
Whatcha mean, no deal?
Is this Deja Vu, or what? Where have we heard such things 'afore?
Ja wohl, mein Herr.
Social collapse . . . Economic collapse. . . Can seem kinda close at times like these.
The clock, she is a tickin'.
We may use a lot of deodorant hereabouts, but Merkan brains generally gotta take the cake as the world's most manipulated and confused . . .
'Drather have the stink, myself . . .
gagnrad: Aurator gets a golden medallion for originality.
BTW, years ago, I saw a comic strip ( merkan, of course ) , where one of the Australian characters uttered these immortal words, "Owl 'Strine stalk log this."
Always wondered what a real 'Strine would sound like reading that sentence. :- )
http://www.detnews.com/EDITPAGE/9805/28/snow/snow.htm
We must be on our toes -- if the Clinton popularity droops, so may the markets.
"My wife comes from a country where the penalty for murder, among other things, was death. No if's and's or but's. They also had incredibily strict gun control laws.
Simply put, citizens did not own guns. Only persons who were professionally trained to handle lethal weapons were allowed to
possess them. The murder rate by guns was just about zero. Unfortunately, the murder rate of innocent citizens by the government was very high, especially if you were poor and could not afford a good lawyer. "
OK so far... To continue..
"When the country became more liberalized, the death penalty laws were relaxed, but not the gun control laws. "
Again, OK... I am following your thoughts. Onward I go...
"The murder rate by guns went up while the rate death by government execution went down."
Uh Oh! I'm getting confused here! The gun laws didn't change, but the murder rate went up? Hmmmm, how can this be??? OK, onward...
"Either way, whether the government kills innocent people in an electric chair or by making them prey to untrained novices and criminals to whom they give easy access to guns by failing to control them, the effect is more or less the same."
WHOOOPS! Where did that one come from????? I thought that the government DIDN"T change the gun laws? Where did the easy access come from?? A definite non sequitur here. OK, onward...
" You seem to lean more toward death by government execution. I like the example set by countries that do not allow any joker to own lethal weapons. "
WOW! So only jokers own lethal weapons because they are not a member of the government body? So I think what you are saying is that only the government should own weapons? Hmmmm, I'll have to think about that one, along with tyrants and despots...
Davis ) .
P.S. Good article on information warfare ( scroll
to find ) :
Of course there will be situations where right and wrong is clear and war is necessary, say against Hitler, etc. But not protestant against catholic, or jew against moslem.
You might be interested in the views of a friend of mine who claims he knows a little ancient middle eastern history. Apparently around the time of Solomon, or a little bit earlier, there was little distinction between arab and jew. At that time apparently the local culture all centered about the Temple Mount, which was a respository for knowledge of some kind. Little villages ( tribes? ) formed about this center of knowledge. Something like the story of the tower of babel evolved, and the differences between the various tribes increased with time. There probably was a little competition as to whom would have control of the temple mount. So, according to this story, arab ( moslem ) and jew may have common ancestors. This makes alot of sense when you consider that they both have claimed the same city for centuries. Would be interesting to do DNA/family studies -- might be an eye opener.
Catholic and protestant have even more in common historically than jew and arab.
My opinion about religion is that it is distorted by the foibles of human interpretation. No religion is necessarily a priori any more false or true than any other. Hence much is learned by studying all the world's religions, as what is significant to religion is what is common to all religion, IMHO. This is the only way the the human factor can be discerned, and the essence of 'true' religion filtered out.
I rarely post as I am mostly content to read and soak in
the wisdom that is Kitco.
As my work takes me out of town several days at a time, I
just now read up to last nights Kitco action with the RJ and
Farfel situation, etc. I had to jump ahead here and add a
comment:
Farfel, I rank your words of knowledge and wisdom among the
top 3 or 4 here at Kitco and you are certainly one of my
favorites ( as is RJ ) .
Please reconsider, if you haven't already.
Thank you and God bless you.
JTF: Interesting that you would mention this. Have you read about the EurAsia '98 Genetic Odyssey? The BBC covers it here: http://news.bbc.co.uk:80/hi/english/special_report/1998/eurasia_98/newsid_81000/81868.stm . It blows me away that this can even be done. It's the stuff of science fiction, and few could have anticipated it even as recently as a few generations ago. I'll bet a lot of fundamentalists are going to be hopping mad when the results are finally in.
On guns: ANYONE who trusts the state enough to surrender the only real means of self-defense he has, does not deserve his freedom, IMO. France just this week passed strict gun control legislation outlawing ALL guns, except those that are in the hands of certified collectors and hunters. And as I posted elsewhere on the net, the U.S. govt should now pass a law strictly forbidding the future commitment of any U.S. troops or aid when next the French people awake to discover the heel of a tyrant pressing down on their throats. If they want to be sheep, let them be sheep. But not ONE DROP of Merkan blood should ever be spilled saving them yet again from their folly. IMHO.
'Das right.
I am checking in real quick.......to see that kitco is on fire!
Auratoragantor is in fine form and loves ALL merkins/merkans...........btw.......the Channel Islands ( to me ) is just offa the California coast.......uh huh. They are *the* ( smile thingy ) Channel Islands.......Catalina being the place to take the babe for some frolic&fun............yes.
away.......to bask in the glory of his first EVER ( 4 par ) eagle.....................yahooooo!
TeddO............love it! go gold..........
away...........to the bash.
Find out more about Kitco at info@kitco.com, or call 1-800-363-7053.
Copyright © 1996 Kitco Minerals & Metals Inc.
I have an idea, it would be great for everybody new and old to the site. RERUNS!!!! Thanks to Bart's computer you cold go back and pick out a few of your finer pieces and bring them forward. "The Best of Farfel" What you do is post from another computer, obviously, under a differenct name. Actually, the newposter could give do a little critic, occasionally.